July referendum for one man, one vote Reviewed by Momizat on . Rating:
You Are Here: Home » Local News » July referendum for one man, one vote

July referendum for one man, one vote

Campaigners for one man, one vote gather signatures recently in George Town.

Campaigners for one man, one vote gather signatures recently in George Town.

Premier McKeeva Bush announced in the Legislative Assembly today that a referendum will be held on 18 July for the introduction of single member constituencies or one person, one vote in the Cayman Islands.

This comes in the wake of a petition, being circulated since February calling for a referendum and the introduction of single member constituencies for the May 2013 general election. The petition has been spearheaded by North Side MLA Ezzard Miller, East End MLA Arden McLean and a group of concerned Caymanians. The petition organisers have said they have collected close to the 3,800 signatures required to trigger a people-initiated referendum.

The Premier’s announcement is a departure from an earlier promise to hold the referendum at the 2013 election.

The following is the full text of the Premier’s speech.

 Madam Speaker,

This Government has given significant consideration to the current national discussion on the issue of single member constituencies, against a background that this has been an issue of debate for more than a decade and much time and energy has been expended on it.

It is a very divisive issue and when combined with the politics that have been infused into the discussion, it has, and will create significant confusion in these Islands.

The Boundaries Commission says the following about Multimember Constituencies:
What are the benefits of the Multimember Districts/Constituencies? As defined within the 2010 Boundaries Commission Report, The advantages of the multimember districts may be summed up as follows:

(1) They can more easily reflect administrative divisions or communities of interest within the country because there is flexibility with regard to the numbers of representatives per district and the size and geographic composition of the district;

(2) They need not change boundaries, even if the population of a district increases or decreases, because the number of representatives elected from the district can be altered;
(3) In a scenario of achieving proportional representation, they are preferred, although not all multimember district systems produce proportional representation for political parties; and

(4) They tend to produce more balanced representation by encouraging the nomination of a diverse roster of candidates.

They also represent a better chance to have a connection with the ruling party.

The disadvantages of multimember districts are as follows:

(1) They dilute the relationship between representatives and voters; and

(2) They blur the accountability of individual representatives. End of quote.

Madam Speaker, it doesn’t end there. Here are a few reasons why I feel that the adoption of Single Member Constituencies is not for us, and should not be implemented:

(1) It will mean the possibility of increased demands on the country’s limited resources, where each constituency will demand individual services and amenities at great expense.

(2) People who were historically used to voting for and having multiple representatives to represent them, under the changed system would only have a single representative. So people would be put in a worse position; for most people who live in constituencies with 4 -3- 2- representatives – if they move to 1, their Franchise rights will be severely shrunken

(3) It’s divisive: It will be one of the most divisive paths for these islands, as it will divide our indigenous vote.

(4) It will create deeply divided and insular constituencies

(5) It will create vast expenses – needing 18 constituency offices, 18 Secretaries with associated resources.

(6) With a different proposal from the Opposition for the Sister Islands – it will mean 1 Country, 2 systems – a different one for Cayman Brac and Little Cayman as against the single member district for Grand Cayman.

This only shows the hypocrisy of what is being proposed. The Sister Islands have said no to single member constituencies. So to appease the PPM’s member of that district they want to give them something different. If the Opposition or anyone, thinks that Single Member Constituencies is so good for Grand Cayman, why then do they want something different for the Sister Islands?

Many other ramifications would follow, which the public is not now being shown.

My Government had previously made a commitment to hold a referendum on the issue at the same time as the next general election. However due to the deepening divide in the country caused by the way the Opposition, and the Independent Member from North Side, has used this issue, my Government feels it responsible to put this issue to the electors of this country. In our maturing democracy I feel that it’s important that the public be given its full voice on this most important constitutional issue.

In this vein I am pleased to announce that the Government will hold a Referendum on the issue of Single Member Constituencies on 18th July, 2012.

Madam Speaker, our present electoral system has only improved over the years. We have a very high turnout of people voting.

• 1988 – 9455 people on the official register; 6210 people cast votes at the polls
• 1992 – 10,196 people on the official register; 8,346 people cast votes at the polls
• 1996 – 10,450 people on the official register; 8,872 people cast votes at the polls
• 2000 – 11,636 people on the official register; 8,872 people cast votes at the polls
• 2005 – 13,118 people on the official register; 10,330 people cast votes at the polls
• 2009 – 15,361 people on the official register; a total of 12,204 people cast votes at the polls

Madam Speaker, you will note from these figures that the number of people who cast votes has risen from 66 percent in 1988 to 80 percent in 2009.

My position is, if it’s not broken – we shouldn’t meddle with it.

And therefore, the Government will embark on a public education process on the proposal for single member constituencies, which would be a significant change in a very important component of our historically strong and respected democracy.

I am optimistic that after the intelligent people of the Cayman Islands have made themselves fully knowledgeable and informed on the pros and cons of the various systems, as they have always done, they will make the right decision on this subject.

Thank you Madam Speaker.

Comments

comments

Comments (2)

  • Dr.Florence Goring-Nozza,D,Div.

    REFERENDUM DAY SHOULD BE A HOLIDAY

    As the Petition for referendum for One Man One Vote continues, Caymanians now know that they will go to the polls in July to decide if the three Islands will adopt single member constituencies.
    In contrast, Premier Bush’ and his UDP government will launch a campaign against the referendum. Caymanians can expect the premier to start traveling the country promoting his anti-Referendum Rule. All UDP views expressed will not be in agreement with the ideology of the people’s initiated referendum now 3,000 voter signatures strong.
    It is quite disturbing that Mr. Bush has decided that this day should not be a holiday, as this would allow for mass voter turnout at the polls on July 18, twelve weeks from now. There’s just one question, is this a political ploy to cut back on the number of signatures required for this referendum to pass legislation, what exactly are those questions that would be asked the voters? and the suspicion surrounding the timing of the Premier’s designated date for this voting exercise by local constituents?
    Without a public holiday, that could possibly influence or reduce the number of votes by decreasing the number of people at the polls from productive voting that would guarantee the Referendum passing legislation. This affects the working middle class who are the political decision makers and who would more than likely be on vacation with their families during mid July. You be the judge.
    The compass stated that “According to Mr. Charles Glidden Press Secretary for the UDP he also stated that Referendum Day will not be a holiday. According to the Public Holidays Law [2007 Revision] schedule, public holidays shall include: “The day appointed under the Elections Law for the taking of the poll at a general election in the Islands.” Whether a referendum is legally considered a general election isn’t clear. The Public Holidays Law was written prior to the 2009 constitutional amendment that allowed for voter-initiated referendum.
    Never mind the UDP campaign against the petition for referendum Caymanian voters and the opposition I’m sure will have an alternative to such gimmicks.
    As Referendum day approaches on July 18th we must still live with the determination to change from the old system of voting producing home grown dictatorship governments to the new system of the people’s choice; One Man One Vote .
    The Opposition Leader and the independent member for North Side and East End Members are to be commended for spearheading this petition for a referendum and we encourage them to remain sober and vigilant. Sober and vigilant in this important matter means nothing more and nothing less than tapping the governor on the shoulder to get his attention to do his part in the process.
    This petition for one Man One Vote referendum is history in the making for these islands and the governor is not exempt but he also has a responsible role to play to ensure that the people of the Cayman Islands enjoy their democratic right to make the political decisions they themselves choose and are accommodated.
    The governor should now seriously consider using his executive powers and declare Referendum Day July l8, 2012 a Public Holiday.

    Dr. Florence Goring-Nozza, D.Div.

    Reply
  • anonymous

    It would be nice if July 18, was a holiday.
    There is a war going on between the governor and the premier.
    Maybe just maybe, the governor showing his power will declare a holiday to spite the UDP and its campaign against the One man one vote petition for a people’s initiated referendum.

    The PPM seems to be making some mistakes as things are not going as planned. They are too sure of themselves underestimating the UDP and its leader.

    The PPM need to go back to the drawing table and get a Plan B to defeat the efforts by the UDP to defeat the one man one vote referendum.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

*

© 2013 Cayman Net News

Scroll to top